[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 143750] Use UNUSED_PARAM instead of the void casting to suppress unused parameter warnings

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Apr 15 11:36:11 PDT 2015


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143750

--- Comment #13 from Sungmann Cho <sungmann.cho at navercorp.com> ---
Addressed your comments.(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > Comment on attachment 250791 [details]
> > > Patch
> > > 
> > > Ouch, it's so ugly. :-/ Unfortunately we can't put UNUSED_PARAM to the same
> > > place as init list.
> > > 
> > > I think this one would be the least ugly solution
> > > 
> > > NotificationPermissionRequestManager::
> > > NotificationPermissionRequestManager(WebPage* page)
> > > {
> > > #if ENABLE(NOTIFICATIONS) || ENABLE(LEGACY_NOTIFICATIONS)
> > >     m_page = page
> > > #else
> > >     UNUSED_PARAM(page);
> > > #endif
> > > }
> > 
> > Agreed. But the member initialization is slightly different from the
> > assignment.
> > Any thoughts on this?
> 
> I think biggest difference is generally that copy constructor of *WebPage*
> class is called or not. In this case, however, m_page is a pointer type of
> *WebPage*. Thus it seems to me that there is no big difference between both.

(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > Comment on attachment 250791 [details]
> > > Patch
> > > 
> > > Ouch, it's so ugly. :-/ Unfortunately we can't put UNUSED_PARAM to the same
> > > place as init list.
> > > 
> > > I think this one would be the least ugly solution
> > > 
> > > NotificationPermissionRequestManager::
> > > NotificationPermissionRequestManager(WebPage* page)
> > > {
> > > #if ENABLE(NOTIFICATIONS) || ENABLE(LEGACY_NOTIFICATIONS)
> > >     m_page = page
> > > #else
> > >     UNUSED_PARAM(page);
> > > #endif
> > > }
> > 
> > Agreed. But the member initialization is slightly different from the
> > assignment.
> > Any thoughts on this?
> 
> I think biggest difference is generally that copy constructor of *WebPage*
> class is called or not. In this case, however, m_page is a pointer type of
> *WebPage*. Thus it seems to me that there is no big difference between both.

I addressed your comments. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20150415/460867bb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list