[webkit-reviews] review canceled: [Bug 58847] [Qt] REGRESSION(r84099): It made two Qt API tests fail : [Attachment 93214] The failing test now works and tests what it was supposed to do, but also added a new one to make sure the opposite scenario wouldn't work.

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

Rafael Brandao <rafael.lobo at openbossa.org> has canceled Rafael Brandao
<rafael.lobo at openbossa.org>'s request for review:
Bug 58847: [Qt] REGRESSION(r84099): It made two Qt API tests fail
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58847

Attachment 93214: The failing test now works and tests what it was supposed to
do, but also added a new one to make sure the opposite scenario wouldn't work.
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=93214&action=review

------- Additional Comments from Rafael Brandao <rafael.lobo at openbossa.org>
I've added more negative tests in the meantime, and the new ones that would
make use of local storage. I was wondering if I should keep this in two
separated tests, but for now it seemed right to me to keep them all together as
it would be better for understanding the relationship between base url and
local storage.

Any feedbacks are welcome. :)