[webkit-reviews] review requested: [Bug 58847] [Qt] REGRESSION(r84099): It made two Qt API tests fail : [Attachment 95939] modified new test so it could also check for positive scenario (also changed its name)

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

Rafael Brandao <rafael.lobo at openbossa.org> has asked  for review:
Bug 58847: [Qt] REGRESSION(r84099): It made two Qt API tests fail
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58847

Attachment 95939: modified new test so it could also check for positive
scenario (also changed its name)
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=95939&action=review

------- Additional Comments from Rafael Brandao <rafael.lobo at openbossa.org>
I've added more negative tests in the meantime, and the new ones that would
make use of local storage. I was wondering if I should keep this in two
separated tests, but for now it seemed right to me to keep them all together as
it would be better for understanding the relationship between base url and
local storage.

Any feedbacks are welcome. :)