[webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development

[Alexis Menard]

INdT will join. We'll focus the entire week on getting bugs fixed, no
new features.

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Zeno Albisser <zeno at webkit.org> wrote:
>
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 7:44 PM, simon.hausmann at nokia.com wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> A lot of these regressions are also due to behavioral changes in Qt, but they still end up as regressions because
>> they require us to change the way we use Qt.
>>
>> Ossy is right, this is getting way to big and we're running risk of destabilizing our foundations. At the same time
>> new features are being implemented at a rapid pace (maybe it's catching up with other ports or implementing
>> WebCore interfaces, but they're still new features).
>>
>> We are now in week 18. How about we target week 20 for an concentrated effort of getting our test coverage back up? (that gives
>> a week to finish your pending features ;)
>>
>> Who's in? :)
>>
>
> me. :)
>
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org [webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org] on behalf of ext Osztrogonac Csaba [oszi at inf.u-szeged.hu]
>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 18:50
>> To: webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Osztrogonac Csaba írta:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2
>>> performance bots.
>>>
>>> Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk:
>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100
>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101
>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102
>>>
>>> You can find the updated build script here:
>>> https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
>>>
>>> New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri
>>> May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000)
>>>
>>> And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1
>>> layout tests.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/
>>> I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests.
>>
>> I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the
>> new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!)
>>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5
>>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629
>>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1
>>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631
>>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html started to crash with newer Qt5
>>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632
>>
>> Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit don't matter at all.
>> I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor figure:
>>  - meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long
>>    depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
>>  - meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test failures
>>    with very very long depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
>>
>> br,
>> Ossy
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-qt mailing list
>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-qt mailing list
>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt



-- 
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Software Engineer
openBossa @ INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia