[webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development

[Balazs Kelemen]

On 05/07/2012 05:30 PM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> INdT will join. We'll focus the entire week on getting bugs fixed, no
> new features.

Szeged joins as well. ;)

>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Zeno Albisser<zeno at webkit.org>  wrote:
>>
>> On May 4, 2012, at 7:44 PM, simon.hausmann at nokia.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> A lot of these regressions are also due to behavioral changes in Qt, but they still end up as regressions because
>>> they require us to change the way we use Qt.
>>>
>>> Ossy is right, this is getting way to big and we're running risk of destabilizing our foundations. At the same time
>>> new features are being implemented at a rapid pace (maybe it's catching up with other ports or implementing
>>> WebCore interfaces, but they're still new features).
>>>
>>> We are now in week 18. How about we target week 20 for an concentrated effort of getting our test coverage back up? (that gives
>>> a week to finish your pending features ;)
>>>
>>> Who's in? :)
>>>
>> me. :)
>>
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org [webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org] on behalf of ext Osztrogonac Csaba [oszi at inf.u-szeged.hu]
>>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 18:50
>>> To: webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>>> Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Osztrogonac Csaba írta:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2
>>>> performance bots.
>>>>
>>>> Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk:
>>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100
>>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101
>>>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102
>>>>
>>>> You can find the updated build script here:
>>>> https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
>>>>
>>>> New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri
>>>> May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000)
>>>>
>>>> And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1
>>>> layout tests.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/
>>>> I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests.
>>> I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the
>>> new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!)
>>>   - [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5
>>>     https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629
>>>   - [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1
>>>     https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631
>>>   - [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html started to crash with newer Qt5
>>>     https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632
>>>
>>> Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit don't matter at all.
>>> I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor figure:
>>>   - meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long
>>>     depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
>>>   - meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test failures
>>>     with very very long depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
>>>
>>> br,
>>> Ossy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-qt mailing list
>>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-qt mailing list
>>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-qt mailing list
>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>
>