[webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development

[Zeno Albisser]

On May 4, 2012, at 7:44 PM, simon.hausmann at nokia.com wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> A lot of these regressions are also due to behavioral changes in Qt, but they still end up as regressions because
> they require us to change the way we use Qt.
> 
> Ossy is right, this is getting way to big and we're running risk of destabilizing our foundations. At the same time
> new features are being implemented at a rapid pace (maybe it's catching up with other ports or implementing
> WebCore interfaces, but they're still new features).
> 
> We are now in week 18. How about we target week 20 for an concentrated effort of getting our test coverage back up? (that gives
> a week to finish your pending features ;)
> 
> Who's in? :)
> 

me. :)

> 
> 
> Simon
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org [webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org] on behalf of ext Osztrogonac Csaba [oszi at inf.u-szeged.hu]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 18:50
> To: webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Osztrogonac Csaba írta:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2
>> performance bots.
>> 
>> Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk:
>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100
>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101
>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102
>> 
>> You can find the updated build script here:
>> https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
>> 
>> New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri
>> May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000)
>> 
>> And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1
>> layout tests.
>> 
>> Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/
>> I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests.
> 
> I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the
> new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!)
>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5
>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629
>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1
>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631
>  - [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html started to crash with newer Qt5
>    https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632
> 
> Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit don't matter at all.
> I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor figure:
>  - meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long
>    depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
>  - meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test failures
>    with very very long depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
> 
> br,
> Ossy
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt