[webkit-qt] Does QtWebKit API tests need attention?

[Alexis Menard]

We have already people looking at it.

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 is an example.

But exactly as Benjamin said, we're just unstaffed.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Poulain
<benjamin.poulain at nokia.com> wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 09:46 AM, ext Zoltan Horvath wrote:
>>
>> Currently, we are running qtwebkit-tests on our bots, but does it make
>> sense to run these?
>> Now, 203 are passed, 6 are failed, 2 are skipped. Is this acceptable?
>> It keeps our bot always orange. I don't think that it is a good message
>> that we have API regressions.
>>
>> It would be really nice if someone from Nokia side could make time to
>> take care API-tests (if these are important of course).
>>
>> Any thoughts and/or volunteers?
>
> They are important.
> The problem is we are currently understaffed due to an internal Nokia
> project taking lots of engineers.
>
> I suggest to add "expected failure" exceptions for the failing tests. And
> create a P1 tasks for each one.
>
> Failing API tests are particularly dangerous for releases. It is one of the
> focus of QtWebKit 2.2. Anyone is welcome to help on this problem.
>
> cheers,
> Benjamin
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
>



-- 
Alexis Menard
Software Engineer
INdT Recife Brazil