[webkit-qt] Does QtWebKit API tests need attention?

Osztrogonac Csaba oszi at inf.u-szeged.hu
Wed Jun 1 05:28:04 PDT 2011


It doesn't seems to be so important for Nokia, because on
QtWebKit 2.2 branch there are many failing API tests too:
- QtWebKit2.2-branch x86-32 Linux Release Qt 4.7.x: 5 failing tests
- QtWebKit2.2-branch x86-32 Linux Release Qt 4.8.x: 7 failing tests
- QtWebKit2.2-branch SnowLeopard Intel Release: 12 failing tests

They aren't new regressions, they are at least a month old bugs.
And we don't mentioned the trunk, 64 bit platform, Symbian, ...


Benjamin Poulain írta:
> They are important.
> The problem is we are currently understaffed due to an internal Nokia 
> project taking lots of engineers.
> I suggest to add "expected failure" exceptions for the failing tests. 
> And create a P1 tasks for each one.
> Failing API tests are particularly dangerous for releases. It is one of 
> the focus of QtWebKit 2.2. Anyone is welcome to help on this problem.
> cheers,
> Benjamin

More information about the webkit-qt mailing list