[webkit-dev] chromium-cg-mac results

[David Levin]

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
> >>> It looks like Chromium Mac has successfully moved to Skia.
> >>
> >> I'd wait with this assessment until a version of Chrome with Skia has
> >> shipped to stable. Things are looking really good so that should be
> >> smooth sailing, but it's a bit early to say we're "successfully moved"
> >> :-)
> >
> > Fair enough.  However, I believe the Skia transition plan called for
> > removing the chromium-cg-mac expectation much earlier than a Skia
> > build shipping to stable.  Originally, we were only supposed to have
> > to maintain both sets of expectations for about a month.  The
> > transition has taken longer than expected, but it seems like we have
> > sufficient confidence in Skia now that we can remove the
> > chromium-cg-mac expectations.
> >
>
> Has the skia transition hit beta yet? It seems like as soon as we get
> it onto a version that is pointing to a branched version of webkit, we
> should be completely safe to remove the directories on trunk (frankly,
> I'd agree with Adam that it's probably safe to remove it now, since we
> can always add them back in if we have to, but I can compromise as
> well).
>

Remove it.

It is a cost on everyone who enlists in WebKit. Those of us who aren't
creating new enlistments are not affected much but that doesn't mean it
isn't costly.

dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20120103/40588bc6/attachment.html>