[webkit-dev] chromium-cg-mac results
Elliot Poger
epoger at chromium.org
Wed Jan 4 06:10:05 PST 2012
I agree that it is reasonable (and a good idea) to remove the
chromium-cg-mac expectations from WebKit now, and I am willing to take the
lead on doing so (although I will need help from WebKit committers).
Please let me know if anyone agrees/disagrees with the following steps to
do so:
1. remove the following buildbots that rely on chromium-cg-mac expectations
(otherwise, they will start failing once the CG expectations disappear):
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac%20Builder%20%28CG%29%28deps%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.6%20%28CG%29%28deps%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac%20Builder%20%28CG%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.5%20%28CG%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.6%20%28CG%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac%20Builder%20%28CG%29%28dbg%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.5%20%28CG%29%28dbg%29%281%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.5%20%28CG%29%28dbg%29%282%29
-
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/Webkit%20Mac10.6%20%28CG%29%28dbg%29
2. remove the LayoutTests/platform/*-cg-* directories from the WebKit repo
3. remove any CG-specific entries from
LayoutTests/platform/chromium/test-expectations.txt
4. remove any CG-specific test code from the Tools/Scripts/webkitpy tree
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:01 AM, David Levin <levin at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
>> >>> It looks like Chromium Mac has successfully moved to Skia.
>> >>
>> >> I'd wait with this assessment until a version of Chrome with Skia has
>> >> shipped to stable. Things are looking really good so that should be
>> >> smooth sailing, but it's a bit early to say we're "successfully moved"
>> >> :-)
>> >
>> > Fair enough. However, I believe the Skia transition plan called for
>> > removing the chromium-cg-mac expectation much earlier than a Skia
>> > build shipping to stable. Originally, we were only supposed to have
>> > to maintain both sets of expectations for about a month. The
>> > transition has taken longer than expected, but it seems like we have
>> > sufficient confidence in Skia now that we can remove the
>> > chromium-cg-mac expectations.
>> >
>>
>> Has the skia transition hit beta yet? It seems like as soon as we get
>> it onto a version that is pointing to a branched version of webkit, we
>> should be completely safe to remove the directories on trunk (frankly,
>> I'd agree with Adam that it's probably safe to remove it now, since we
>> can always add them back in if we have to, but I can compromise as
>> well).
>>
>
> Remove it.
>
> It is a cost on everyone who enlists in WebKit. Those of us who aren't
> creating new enlistments are not affected much but that doesn't mean it
> isn't costly.
>
> dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20120104/776f7560/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list