darin at apple.com
Sat Jun 14 22:26:37 PDT 2008
On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>> Cut down on confusing uses of "Object" and "Imp".
> Should we add the JS prefix to these, too?
I'm not sure.
If we want to add a JS prefix to all these names, then there'd be even
more names to change because I left some closely related names alone,
and they'd need the JS prefixes.
A while back, I added JS to "Value" and "Object" because even with a
namespace, the names "Value" and "Object" didn't seem clearly enough
these other types too. It's hard to say. Maybe we do indeed want JS
prefixes on all of these.
More information about the webkit-dev