[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 178554] Web Inspector: Layer mutations should be purely based on layerId, not based on nodeId
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Oct 20 22:10:29 PDT 2017
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178554
Devin Rousso <webkit at devinrousso.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |webkit at devinrousso.com
--- Comment #2 from Devin Rousso <webkit at devinrousso.com> ---
Comment on attachment 324320
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=324320
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=324320&action=review
> Source/WebInspectorUI/ChangeLog:9
> + * UserInterface/Controllers/LayerTreeManager.js:
> + (WI.LayerTreeManager.prototype.layerTreeMutations):
This could use an explanation as to why this is needed or what the problem originally was.
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Controllers/LayerTreeManager.js:-59
> - return layer.isGeneratedContent ? layer.pseudoElementId : layer.nodeId;
Does this patch still work with pseudo-elements? Adding a test for this would be awesome =D
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Controllers/LayerTreeManager.js:-73
> - if (layer.isReflection)
Is the concept of `isReflection` no longer valid/useful?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20171021/676fa2d8/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list