[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 151743] Move ResourceLoadScheduler to WebKit1
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Dec 2 11:25:30 PST 2015
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151743
Alex Christensen <achristensen at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #266456|review? |review+
Flags| |
--- Comment #10 from Alex Christensen <achristensen at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 266456
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=266456
patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=266456&action=review
r=me with comments.
> Source/WebCore/platform/PlatformStrategies.h:90
> + CookiesStrategy* m_cookiesStrategy { };
Is this the cool new way to say { nullptr }?
> Source/WebKit2/WebProcess/Network/WebResourceLoadScheduler.cpp:294
> + NetworkResourceLoadParameters loadParameters;
defersLoading, needsCertificateInfo, and maximumBufferingTime seem to be uninitialized.
> Source/WebKit2/WebProcess/WebCoreSupport/WebPlatformStrategies.cpp:92
> LoaderStrategy* WebPlatformStrategies::createLoaderStrategy()
These could probably be made to return references.
> Source/WebKit/WebCoreSupport/WebResourceLoadScheduler.cpp:64
> + return static_cast<WebResourceLoadScheduler&>(*platformStrategies()->loaderStrategy());
Why is it ok to dereference this pointer? I think this should be done differently.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20151202/79aaed71/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list