[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 77319] [EFL] Set content hint information for ewk_view_single.

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Jan 30 07:29:15 PST 2012


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77319





--- Comment #16 from KwangHyuk <hyuki.kim at samsung.com>  2012-01-30 07:29:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > (In reply to comment #11)
> > > I think that it could be a good point to start discussion about it, we need a rule for that to avoid some situation in the future.
> > 
> > Do we really need so many rules? Working out all cases and writing everything down takes more time than using some common sense ;) In this case, for example, one wants to compare a const char* with another const char*. There shouldn't be any doubt that creating WTF::Strings here just for that is pointless.
> 
> There is not need to consider a lot of cases. There is only one that is need to be finaly solve. How much c++ we could use inside ewk? :) 
> 
> Yes... I realy don't know why it is not allowed to use classes or even structures that have constructor/destructor inside cpp files for private object inside ewk. Is it allowed to use WebKit's containers inside cpp files inside ewk? If not why? Currently we have a situation that we use: smart pointers, new/delete operators, WTF::String, WebKit's classes or own classes inside WebKitSupport etc. EFL WebKit port is very mixed in languages that uses.

In fact, the reason why I choose std::string or WTF::String was to make it as c++ style.
So, I partially agree with your idea too. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list