[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 45186] Use the Windows thread pool instead of an extra thread for FastMalloc scavenging
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Jan 11 07:31:33 PST 2011
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45186
Adam Roben (aroben) <aroben at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #78526|review?, commit-queue? |review-
Flag| |
--- Comment #4 from Adam Roben (aroben) <aroben at apple.com> 2011-01-11 07:31:33 PST ---
(From update of attachment 78526)
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=78526&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/FastMalloc.cpp:1566
> + while (1) {
> + if (runScavenge())
> + continue;
> +
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&m_scavengeMutex);
> + m_scavengeThreadActive = false;
> + // Block until there are enough free committed pages to release back to the system.
> + pthread_cond_wait(&m_scavengeCondition, &m_scavengeMutex);
> + m_scavengeThreadActive = true;
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&m_scavengeMutex);
> + }
I think it would be a lot better if we followed the libdispatch implementation. periodicScavenge just performs a single scavenge, then waits for the timer to fire again (or stops the timer if no more scavenging is needed). That way we don't tie up a worker thread while we sleep and block.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list