[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 41413] [Qt] QtWebKit needs public API for Notifications.

Fri Jul 2 10:22:14 PDT 2010

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41413


--- Comment #6 from Laszlo Gombos <laszlo.1.gombos at nokia.com>  2010-07-02 10:22:14 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 60152 [details])
> Some comments:

> The use of the origin as string is nice, that's nice. But is it very descriptive? Does it allow the UI on top of QtWebKit to provide enough information to the user? I wonder if these permissions can always be tied to a QWebFrame instead (as first parameter)?
> 

I agree as well the QWebFrame could be more useful; we do not to be careful with the life cycle of the objects:
 - notification itself could outlive the frame by design, but the permission request should be invalidated if the originating frame dies.

 - in general if the context for the permission is a Worker than we have a URL but not a frame, but so far we do not support this case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.