[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 34005] Safari pegs CPU and drops tons of frames using HTML5 Vimeo player
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Apr 30 18:49:09 PDT 2010
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34005
--- Comment #53 from Jer Noble <jer.noble at apple.com> 2010-04-30 18:49:09 PST ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> (From update of attachment 54600 [details])
> WebCore/platform/graphics/win/QTMovie.cpp:266
> + m_private->m_clients.remove(indexOfClient);
> Is this correct? Do you really never want to remove the first client?
You're right, that should be a ">="
> WebCore/platform/graphics/win/QTMovie.h:60
> + class QTMOVIEWIN_API QTMovie : public RefCounted<QTMovie> {
> It seems like this class should be renamed something like QTMovieView or
> QTMovieGWorld. If you don't want to rename it in this round, please add a
> comment.
I agree that QTMovieWin isn't the correct name, and that QTMovieGWorld would be
better. I don't mind doing the re-naming this pass.
>
> WebCore/platform/graphics/win/QTMovieTask.cpp:46
> + static QTMovieTask* s_sharedTask = new QTMovieTask();
> This should use the DEFINE_GLOBAL macro.
>
> r=me but please consider those
> changes.WebCore/platform/graphics/win/QTMovieWin.h:75
> + RefPtr<QTMovie> movie() const;
> We don't ever pass or return RefPtr's. Please see
> http://webkit.org/coding/RefPtr.html for more on that.
It seems like the convention is to move the default constructor into protected:
and add a static constructor method which returns a PassRefPtr. Should I do
that as well to QTMovie, QTMovieGWorld, and QTMovieVisualContext?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list