[webkit-reviews] review denied: [Bug 74071] [Chromium] Chromium should have EditorClientImpl::checkTextOfParagraph : [Attachment 118740] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Dec 12 10:36:15 PST 2011
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google) <fishd at chromium.org> has denied Shinya Kawanaka
<shinyak at chromium.org>'s request for review:
Bug 74071: [Chromium] Chromium should have
EditorClientImpl::checkTextOfParagraph
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74071
Attachment 118740: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=118740&action=review
------- Additional Comments from Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
<fishd at chromium.org>
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=118740&action=review
> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebSpellCheckClient.h:44
> class WebSpellCheckClient {
By the way, it seems like WebSpellCheckClient is misnamed. It should probably
be called WebTextChecker. Such a renaming is out-of-scope for this patch, but
I just wanted to call attention to the issue.
> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebSpellCheckClient.h:57
> + virtual void checkTextOfParagraph(const WebString& text,
This appears to run synchronously, like spellCheck. Should we have an
asynchronous
version like requestCheckingOfText? Also, what about the optionalSuggestions
out-
param of spellCheck? You don't need a way to provide suggestions with this new
API?
It seems like WebSpellCheckClient is a bit of a mess :-(
> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebTextChecking.h:31
> +#ifndef WebTextChecking_h
nit: the file name should match the type name, so WebTextCheckingType.h would
be better.
> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebTextChecking.h:36
> +enum WebTextCheckingType {
WebTextCheckingResult has a similar enum. Presumably, that one should be
deleted
in favor of this one?
> Source/WebKit/chromium/src/EditorClientImpl.cpp:769
> +static void convertCheckingResult(const WebKit::WebTextCheckingResult&
webResult,
nit: please do not break up the flow of class method definitions with non-class
method definitions.
please move static helper functions to the top of the file.
nit: you are already in the WebKit namespace, so no need for WebKit:: here.
also,
there is a 'using namespace WebCore' at the top of the file, so no need for
WebCore::
here either.
nit: consider putting a conversion operator from WebTextCheckingResult to
TextCheckingResult
on WebTextCheckingResult in a #if WEBKIT_IMPLEMENTATION section.
> Source/WebKit/chromium/src/EditorClientImpl.cpp:793
> +
perhaps you should assert that webMask is not 0 after this? it seems like
TextCheckingTypeMask
could have other bits set too.
> Source/WebKit/chromium/src/EditorClientImpl.cpp:795
> + m_webView->spellCheckClient()->checkTextOfParagraph(WebString(text,
length), webMask, &webResults);
do we need to concern ourselves with the cost of constructing the WebString
here?
it seems like if we are doing a lot of spell checking that we might prefer to
avoid the heap allocation here. have you measured this to see if it matters?
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list