[webkit-qt] Fwd: Re: Does QtWebKit API tests need attention?
lists at roberthogan.net
Wed Jun 1 13:19:57 PDT 2011
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] Does QtWebKit API tests need attention?
Date: Wednesday 01 June 2011, 21:18:14
From: Robert Hogan <lists at roberthogan.net>
To: Alexis Menard <alexis.menard at openbossa.org>
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 21:09:13 you wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Robert Hogan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If we get the API tests passing again, shouldn't we make the
> > webkit.org build red if an API test fails?
> That's the idea.
What bothers me about the API tests is that it bails out of the test slot
on the first failure so there could be other stuff lurking there.
So to prevent further regressions we should mark the current failures
XFAIL, file bugs for them and do the buildbot stuff required to make an API
failure red on build.webkit.org.
Any reason not to do that?
Ossy - any idea how to promote API test failures to a red?
> > Robert
> > On Wednesday 01 June 2011 08:46:43 Zoltan Horvath wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >> Currently, we are running qtwebkit-tests on our bots, but does it
> >> make sense to run these?
> >> Now, 203 are passed, 6 are failed, 2 are skipped. Is this acceptable?
> >> It keeps our bot always orange. I don't think that it is a good
> >> message that we have API regressions.
> >> It would be really nice if someone from Nokia side could make time to
> >> take care API-tests (if these are important of course).
> >> Any thoughts and/or volunteers?
> >> Zoltan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> webkit-qt mailing list
> >> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
> > _______________________________________________
> > webkit-qt mailing list
> > webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
More information about the webkit-qt