[webkit-qt] Qt DRT with QGraphicsWebView
kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org
Tue Jun 1 18:19:58 PDT 2010
Thanks for working on this Diego!
As we are recommending people to use the QGraphicsWebView, it is very
important that we know that it has the same pass rate as the QWebView,
and with this change, you have brought us closer in this direction.
When I run the test locally for the QWebView, I also get many failures
due to font differences etc. Would you post your result for the
QWebView for comparison?
Ossy, you run test this patch on the buildbots?
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Diego Gonzalez
<diego.gonzalez at openbossa.org> wrote:
> I've worked in a patch to make possible execute the layout test
> using the QGraphicsWebView backend:
> The idea is to test the QGraphicsWebView deeper and find
> missing features and/or bugs.
> I've gotten the following test result in a webkit trunk build (r60479)
> and Qt 4.7:
> 13502 test cases (97%) succeeded
> 270 test cases (1%) had incorrect layout
> 38 test cases (<1%) were new
> 2 test cases (<1%) crashed
> 163 test cases (1%) had stderr output
> To run the tests with QGraphicsWebView mode just execute:
> QT_DRT_WEBVIEW_MODE=graphics WebKitTools/Scripts/run-webkit-tests --qt
> The next steps is to find missing things to made the tests results be at
> the same of when the tests are executed with QWebView. The related bugs
> should block the meta bug: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40014
> Please let me know if you have comments and suggestions.
> Best Regards,
> Diego Gonzalez
> Nokia Technology Institute, INdT
> Qt Labs Americas
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer
Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT
Phone +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org
More information about the webkit-qt