[webkit-gtk] Upgrading to newer version of webkit - need help.
Michael Catanzaro
mcatanzaro at igalia.com
Fri Jan 9 19:13:54 PST 2015
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Niranjan Rao <nhrdls at gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Right now we are on 2.2.6 version and we are thinking of upgrading.
> Most interesting stuff for us is POODLE vulnerability fix.
You can mitigate POODLE without any update by setting an environment
variable before launching the browser:
export
G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:%COMPAT:%LATEST_RECORD_VERSION:-VERS-SSL3.0
If you upgrade to 2.4.8 and use the WebKit2 API, you won't need to do
that anymore, but if you use the WebKit1 API, you must still do that
for yourself. For WebKit1 applications, consider setting it with
setenv() on the very first line of main(). See [1] for more info on
this.
> The site mentions three versions 2.4.8/2.7.3/2.6.4. Which version
> should be use?
2.7.3 is the unstable version. You don't want that. The odd second
digit indicates that it's unstable, even indicates stable.
2.6.4 is the latest stable version, but 2.4.8 is the last version with
the WebKit1 API. If your application uses WebKit1, you need to stick
with 2.4.x until you have updated it to use the WebKit2 API. 2.6.x and
2.4.x are parallel-installable for this reason.
> We have a custom extension working for version 2.2.6. Should be
> expect any surprises for the extension if we upgrade to newer version?
2.2.x -> 2.4.x should be easy and relatively safe (there will be the
usual mix of bugfixes and new bugs). Both of these versions include
both the WebKit1 and WebKit2 API, to make it easier to transition. Then
you can upgrade to 2.6.x once your app has been ported to WebKit2 (if
it hasn't been already).
> Right now we are on Ubuntu 12.04. We did compile/install all the
> required dependencies needed for 2.2.6 that were not part of standard
> Ubuntu repositories - mostly newer versions of libraries. Will latest
> code run Ubuntu 12.04 if we manage to install dependencies?
If you can install all the dependencies, then it will probably work
fine. Good luck.
Michael
[1]
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2014-October/002110.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/attachments/20150109/e4155224/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-gtk
mailing list