[webkit-efl] Update Skipped file of EFL layout test for Ubuntu 11.10
gyuyoung.kim at samsung.com
Sun Feb 26 18:44:46 PST 2012
>> are you guys thinking of using jhbuild for something else other than
>> making it easier to run the layout tests in different machines?
I think we need to define which font we use during the layout test first.
Then, we are able to start to use jhbuild to run the layout test more easier
in different machines.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: webkit-efl-bounces at lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-efl-
> bounces at lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Raphael Kubo da Costa
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 8:05 AM
> To: webkit-efl at lists.webkit.org
> Subject: Re: [webkit-efl] Update Skipped file of EFL layout test for
> Ubuntu 11.10
> Dominik Röttsches <dominik.rottsches at linux.intel.com> writes:
> > On 02/24/2012 10:50 AM, Gyuyoung Kim wrote:
> >>>> If you let us know, we can work on
> >>>> 1) adopting JHBuild for EFL build procedure
> >>>> 2) creating a defined font configuration before runTest()
> >> I also think we should define which font we use when DRT is run. If
> >> you guys help to support above featurers, I'm willing to help your
> >> contribution. :-)
> > Yes, we'll start with JHBuild, then look at making font configuration
> > more robust.
> I thought about JHBuild at the time I was writing the DRT code mainly to
> try to overcome the font rendering differences we get across distros,
> but the GTK+ folks had not gone "nuclear"  yet and I ended up
> considering it too extreme a measure.
> What intrigues me is the distiction being made between points 1 and 2:
> are you guys thinking of using jhbuild for something else other than
> making it easier to run the layout tests in different machines?
>  https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2011-
> Raphael Kubo da Costa
> ProFUSION embedded systems
> webkit-efl mailing list
> webkit-efl at lists.webkit.org
More information about the webkit-efl