[webkit-efl] test_expectations.txt vs Skipped for EFL - Was Re: [webkit-dev] handling failing tests ...
dominik.rottsches at linux.intel.com
Fri Apr 13 08:01:37 PDT 2012
On 04/13/2012 05:29 PM, Gyuyoung Kim wrote:
> >> EFL port currently has both, test_expectations.txt and Skipped.
> >> Skipped is more frequently updated and works as our reference. But
> recently, I admit I moved some cases to test_expectations.txt after
> >> rebaselining.
> In my humble opinion, we need to go text_expectation.txt. As far as I
> know, text_expectation.txt is to deal with unsupported test cases.
> However, as you know, it is not easy to move from Skipped file to
> text_expectation.txt due to the many unsupported test cases in Skipped
> file. If we can use both Skipped file and test_expectation.txt for a
> while, it is easy to move after reducing Skipped file as much as we can.
That sounds good to me.
Alright - for now, I am going to move the permanent failures we see on
the bots into "SKIP" lines in test expectations.
Dominik Röttsches<dominik.rottsches at linux.intel.com>
More information about the webkit-efl