[webkit-dev] Can the WebKit logo be used for WebKit ports? (like WebKitGTK)

[Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez]

On 03/10/2019 00:43, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I don't know the rules regarding the logo use but it might be a bit
> misleading to use WebKit logo without any qualification for GTK+ port on
> wpt.fyi.
> 
> I'd imagine people who visiting wpt.fyi may not realize how different GTK+
> and Apple's WebKit ports are in terms of set of features being enabled, and
> which sets of tests pass in each port.
> 
> So at minimum, we may want to add some kind of indication that it's GTK+
> port; or that it's distinct from Apple's WebKit ports if you were to use
> WebKit's logo somehow.

I agree that its important to not confuse users and make clearer that
the results are for the WebKitGTK port.

On one hand the name would be WebKitGTK and the platform Linux, and on
the other hand it would have on the smaller icon at the left a Tux (the
classic Linux penguin).

See this example of how it would look (without logo still):

https://wpt.fyi/results/?run_id=334360001&run_id=336100010&run_id=322590004&run_id=332480002&run_id=332480003


However, I agree that still can be confusing if we use the WebKit logo
as is. So, let's discard doing that.

But, I wonder if it would be OK to use a variation of the WebKit logo
with some clearly visible modifications like different colors.

For example: https://cloud.igalia.com/index.php/s/y4xrKBYBY8t643D
(Its the WebKit logo but with the GTK colors)


Would be using this variation of the logo OK?


Thanks

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20191009/48a71e7e/attachment.bin>