[webkit-dev] Another WPT bite
youennf at gmail.com
Thu May 11 20:33:00 PDT 2017
Patch just landed.
Location is LayoutTests/http/wpt.
I also forgot to say that, should you want to write http served tests, it
might make sense to use this folder instead of http/tests.
Le jeu. 11 mai 2017 à 19:05, Sam Weinig <weinig at apple.com> a écrit :
> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, youenn fablet <youennf at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Discussing with some WebKittens, testharness.js is more and more used in
> Is it time to make testharness.js the recommended way of writing
> I am in favor of this. If we simplified the question to some form of, “do
> we really need both testharness.js/testharnessreport.js and js-test-pre.js/js-test-post.js?”
> I am even more in favor, as having two test harnesses seems unnecessary,
> cumbersome and unfriendly to new contributors,
> Do I think all tests should use testharness.js? No. Just as currently I
> don’t think all tests should use testharness.js/testharnessreport.js. But
> for many tests of new web platform features, it seems quite reasonable to
> start using this harness, as the benefits, which include a good feature
> set, easier interoperability with other browsers, and a reduced cost to
> upstreaming to web-platform-tests, out weigh the costs, leaning something
> new (there are probably other costs I am forgetting).
> To continue moving forward, some of us are proposing to serve all tests in
> LayoutTests/wpt through the WPT server .
> This would serve some purposes like increasing the use of WPT goodies:
> file-specific headers, templated tests (*.any.js), IDLParser, server-side
> It could also ease test migration from WebKit to W3C WPT.
> This seems uncontroversial and great to me (which would make sense since I
> asked you if we could do it). It’s just a new directory, like
> LayoutTests/http where we can put tests that use the WPT server.
> - Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the webkit-dev