[webkit-dev] Using "auto <function()> -> returnType" breaks prepare-ChangeLog
Sam Weinig
weinig at apple.com
Fri Jul 28 11:06:02 PDT 2017
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Brady Eidson <beidson at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Sam Weinig <weinig at apple.com <mailto:weinig at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>> For some generic programming, this form can be dramatically shorter:
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> template<typename KeyArg, typename MappedArg, typename HashArg, typename KeyTraitsArg, typename MappedTraitsArg>
>> template<typename K, typename V>
>> ALWAYS_INLINE auto HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, MappedTraitsArg>::inlineAdd(K&& key, V&& value) -> AddResult
>> {
>> return m_impl.template add<HashMapTranslator<KeyValuePairTraits, HashFunctions>>(std::forward<K>(key), std::forward<V>(value));
>> }
>>
>> vs.
>>
>> template<typename KeyArg, typename MappedArg, typename HashArg, typename KeyTraitsArg, typename MappedTraitsArg>
>> template<typename K, typename V>
>> ALWAYS_INLINE typename HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, MappedTraitsArg>::AddResult HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, MappedTraitsArg>::inlineAdd(K&& key, V&& value)
>> {
>> return m_impl.template add<HashMapTranslator<KeyValuePairTraits, HashFunctions>>(std::forward<K>(key), std::forward<V>(value));
>> }
>
> In this example, yes it is notably shorter.
>
> But neither of these definitions are remotely readable without puttin' on your thinkin' cap.
>
>> It is also the only format available for lambdas, so people are probably getting used to it.
>
> Lambdas don't have the problem of prepare-ChangeLog completely missing edits to a member function
>
>> Not sure it’s worth it to avoid it.
>
> My request was to be aware of this while prepare-ChangeLog was broken for this case.
> Seems like that's almost fixed. :)
Oh ok. I thought you were proposing a ban.
- Sam
>
> ~Brady
>
>>
>> - Sam
>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Brady Eidson <beidson at apple.com <mailto:beidson at apple.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just noticed this tonight. When a change is made to one of these functions, prepare-ChangeLog doesn't log the functions that changed.
>>>
>>> I have a question and a request.
>>>
>>> Question:
>>>
>>> The functions in question where I noticed this:
>>> auto WebURLSchemeTask::didComplete(const ResourceError& error) -> ExceptionType
>>>
>>> Would normally be written as:
>>> WebURLSchemeTask::ExceptionType WebURLSchemeTask::didComplete(const ResourceError& error)
>>>
>>> Is there some actual value to using this syntax other than… being syntactically different, and being just a little shorter?
>>>
>>> Request:
>>>
>>> Until we fix prepare-ChangeLog, and unless there is some great advantage to this syntax that I'm not aware of… it's hold off on using it more.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ~Brady
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-dev mailing list
>>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org <mailto:webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org>
>>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev <https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20170728/3f452596/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list