[webkit-dev] size_t vs unsigned in WTF::Vector API ?

[Antti Koivisto]

Or Vector and ByteBuffer.

All these cases requiring very large buffers seem to be about untyped data.


   antti

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote:

> That looks like a pretty good performance win.
>
> I'd advocate for SmallVector and Vector, then.
>
> -Filip
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Chris Dumez <cdumez at apple.com> wrote:
>
> The corresponding Blink bug did contain some performance data:
> CrBug#229226 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=229226>
>
> Kr,
> --
> Chris Dumez - Apple Inc.
> Cupertino, CA
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Garen <ggaren at apple.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder what the downsides are to this approach.  Footprint of Vector?
>
>
> It looks like the original change was motivated by shrinking Vector:
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97268
>
> Sadly, it didn’t include any data on the observed benefit :(.
>
> Geoff
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20141120/b6582a7b/attachment.html>