[webkit-dev] bugid in ChangeLog

David Levin levin at chromium.org
Mon Mar 28 10:06:55 PDT 2011

Here's a change that I felt worth getting someone to glance at but didn't
feel worth the overhead of a bug:

Since I was gardener and this was affecting the bots, it was a timely
situation. (Sometimes getting in your fix right before another break comes
in is important in these cases.)


PS Dmitry found a flaw in my original change log text -- due to my haste, I
originally had put in the wrong valgrind error.

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> wrote:

> Can you please explain why?  Its very little overhead and is useful for
> tracking regressions and such.
> J
> On Mar 28, 2011 9:52 AM, "Darin Adler" <darin at apple.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >
> >> I'd even go a bit further and say that if something is worth a review
> (even if it's over the shoulder), it's worth a bug + a bug number.
> >
> > This is where I do not agree. Review is a requirement, but I don’t think
> bugs.webkit.org should be.
> >
> > -- Darin
> >
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20110328/b4f9769b/attachment.html>

More information about the webkit-dev mailing list