[webkit-dev] Lots of “BREW” patches up for review

[David Levin]

Based on this, it sounds like all [BREW] patches should be r-'ed and
appropriate BREW_MP ones submitted?


On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:23 PM, KwangYul Seo <kwangyul.seo at gmail.com>wrote:

> [1] NDA
>
> I checked the issue with Qualcomm and drew two conclusions:
>
> 1) For BREW MP, we can open source our code without any limitation.
>
> 2) For BREW, it is not clear if we can open source our code or not due to
> the NDA with Qualcomm. Hosting and distributing the code can cause a
> potential problem.
>
> This situation is interesting because BREW and BREW MP shares most of the
> API.  I should change the official port name to BREW MP.
>
>
> [2] DumpRenderTree
>
> We are actively working on DumpRenderTree, but it is not ready yet. We plan
> to open it next month.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eric Seidel <eric at webkit.org> wrote:
>
>> I don't feel like this question was ever answered.
>>
>> Folks seem to be moving forward with setting up infrastructure for a
>> real port (which is good), but at least this question still remains.
>>
>> Also, does the BREW port already have a DumpRenderTree implementation?
>>  When should we expect such?
>>
>> -eric
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Holger Freyther <zecke at selfish.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 13 January 2010 18:23:21 Darin Adler wrote:
>> >> Someone is porting WebKit to Qualcomm’s BREW. And there are many
>> patches
>> >>  for that port; now a significant fraction of the unreviewed WebKit
>> >>  patches. Who’s going to review these? Is this a one-time code drop or
>> is
>> >>  there an intent to maintain this port ongoing? Does the test suite
>> work on
>> >>  the BREW platform yet? Will someone maintain a buildbot?
>> >>
>> >> I won’t be reviewing these patches myself until I know the answers to
>> some
>> >>  of those questions.
>> >
>> > Last time I checked one needs to have a contract with Qualcomm (NDA) to
>> get
>> > information (header files, documentation) that is beyond marketing bla
>> bla.
>> >
>> > I would be interested if we are allowed to host and distribute the
>> sourcecode
>> > that has used information which is under a NDA.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > webkit-dev mailing list
>> > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20100122/1e052cca/attachment.html>