naftaly at me.com
Sun Oct 25 18:09:45 PDT 2009
On Oct 25, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Alexander Cohen wrote:
>>>> Just by curiosity, would it be bad to do something like this
>>>> (notice the "newscriptinglang:" in the onload ):
>>>> <a href="http://images.google.com/imghp?hl=en&tab=wi"
>>>> onclick=newscriptinglang:gbar.qs(this) class=gb1>Images</a
>>> "newscriptlanglang:" is interpreted as a goto label. Whether there
>>> is Web content out there accidentally doing that, I don't know.
>> So i would actually need to look at the event handler code scheme
>> my scripting language scheme and handle it if needed. I do how see
>> this could be a problem if a developer had a goto statement that
>> was the same as the name of my scripting language, but the
>> possibility of that is very low, for now.
> Using a meta keyword to declare the event handler scripting language
> globally would not have this problem, or at least it would be much
> less likely. It would also make event listeners using your scripting
> language look nicer. So I continue to recommend that approach. Up to
> you though.
I will definitely look into using the meta keyword, it seems like a
thx again for your input, much appreciated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the webkit-dev