[webkit-dev] Is it OK to remove Frame::setIsDisconnected() and isDisconnected() ?
Sverrir Á. Berg
sverrir at chromium.org
Wed Apr 15 13:29:09 PDT 2009
Hi Adam,Thanks for the links. These are simply exposing the functions as a
formal a API's. I understand that you typically don't want to change
externally exposed API's but these can easily be stubbed out (or removed).
I should have pointed out in my original email that I have tried to remove
these API's and I can still run all the WebKit/Mac tests fine. So at least
two things are missing (IMHO) - tests that verify that this functionality is
working as intended and documentation to tell what that intent is. But this
is only required if somebody is actually using these functions...
Thanks,
Sverrir
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Adam Roben <aroben at apple.com> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Sverrir Á. Berg wrote:
>
> Working on a change in FrameTree and noticed that the checks in top() and
>> parent() for 'checkForDisconnectedFrame' rely on a flag in Frame that as far
>> as I can tell is never set.
>> So my naive question is: Can I remove the corresponding code from Frame
>> and FrameTree? If not I would like if somebody could explain how they are
>> used so I don't break anything with my change.
>>
>> More detail:
>> * My search for calls to Frame::setIsDisconnected reveals no callers in
>> WebKit, Chromium or Google code search.
>>
>
> There are two callers:
>
>
> http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKit/mac/WebView/WebFrame.mm?rev=42451#L1115
>
> and
>
> http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKit/win/WebFrame.cpp?rev=42451#L283
>
> -Adam
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20090415/40d08789/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list