darin at apple.com
Sat Jun 14 22:39:55 PDT 2008
On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I would prefer if we keep a JS prefix only on the objects that seem
> like very generic names otherwise.
Given that rule of thumb, what do you think of these:
"GetterSetterImp" => "JSGetterSetter",
"NumberImp" => "JSNumberCell",
"StringImp" => "JSString",
"ArrayInstance" => "JSArray",
"FunctionImp" => "JSFunction",
Do all of those deserve the JS prefix? Maybe the first three and not
the last two?
> Another thought that came up is that perhaps we should change our
> namespace from KJS to JSC.
I like the idea. But I'm not crazy about the three WebKit namespaces
being WTF, JSC, and WebCore. One of these things is not like the others!
More information about the webkit-dev