[webkit-dev] WebKit Fails to build in XCode 3.1

[Samuel Davis]

Hi Mark,

Thanks again for the hint...

I have been monitoring the Latest Build Status page at http://build.webkit.org/one_box_per_builder 
   and it appears that there hasn't been a successful build for a  
while, at least the status shows that the last 8 build attempts  
failed.  The Status page shows that the last successful build was on  
trunk 27090.  I would have greater confidence that the WebKit source  
would build successfully on my machine if WebKit Org were able to  
build a successful target themselves.  Hence, I will make another  
attempt to build locally when the Build Status shows that a successful  
build has been achieved by WebKit Org.

Also I'm using the Command Line to build my local target.  I have  
examined the log that was produced by the Terminal when I attempted a  
local build and I couldn't find anything that would indicate that an  
error occurred during the build process apart from the comments that I  
sent you below.

Once again, thanks for helping me out :-)

Best regards,

Sam



On 2 Jul 2008, at 01:33, Mark Rowe wrote:

>
> On 2008-07-01, at 17:24, Samuel Davis wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Thanks for the hint ;-)
>>
>> [.. snip ..]
>>
>> The following build commands failed:
>> JavaScriptGlue:
>> 	CopyStringsFile /Users/samueljd/WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/ 
>> JavaScriptGlue.framework/Versions/A/Resources/English.lproj/ 
>> InfoPlist.strings English.lproj/InfoPlist.strings
>> (1 failure)
>
> Again, this only indicates that a command earlier in the build  
> failed.  The specific error message will be earlier in the build  
> transcript.  Are you building from within Xcode or from the command- 
> line? If from the command-line, the full transcript should be  
> displayed in your terminal window.  If you're building from within  
> Xcode, see <http://roobasoft.com/blog/2006/04/17/see-build-transcripts/ 
> > for how to display the build transcript.  If you can provide the  
> actual error that is occurring it will be much easier to help you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>