[webkit-dev] WebKit licensing and LGPLv3
Christopher Brichford
chrisb at adobe.com
Wed Jul 25 10:23:34 PDT 2007
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> With the release of GPLv3 and LGPLv3, I'd like to take a moment to
> discuss WebKit licensing. LGPLv3 includes some restrictions beyond
> the previous version that make it difficult to accept for many key
> contributors and users of WebKit, including Apple. Given this, we'd
> like to keep the project at LGPL 2.1, to make sure it can be used
> in all the ways it is used today.
>
> To that end we'd like to do two things:
>
> 1) We will continue to accept only code that's licensed under a BSD-
> style (no advertising clause) license, or LGPL 2.1, or other
> compatible license. We don't want to accept code that's LGPL 3
> only, as that would make the whole project LGPL 3.
>
Sounds good to me. I'd prefer BSD-style licensing whenever possible.
> 2) We'd like to change the copyright notices from their current mix
> of "LGPL 2 or any later version" and "LGPL 2.1 or any later
> version" to just LGPL 2.1, to make this clear. This one is maybe
> more debatable, so I'd like to know if anyone objects. It would
> prevent incorporating WebKit code into LGPL 3 projects, and would
> require sign-off from all copyright holders to ever change to a
> different LGPL version in the future (in case the FSF came out with
> a version 3.1 or 4 that solved some of the problems with v3).
>
Does not matter to me as long as I can continue to use the version of
the LGPL I am using today.
Chris
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list