<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [ESnext] Implement Object Spread"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167963#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [ESnext] Implement Object Spread"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167963">bug 167963</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sbarati@apple.com" title="Saam Barati <sbarati@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Saam Barati</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=167963#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=304594&action=diff" name="attach_304594" title="Patch for landing">attachment 304594</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=304594&action=edit" title="Patch for landing">[details]</a></span>
> Patch for landing
>
> In an IRC conversation with Saam, I decided to change
> HashMap<Ref<UniquedStringImpl>> usage to an already defined type called
> IdentiferSet. I noticed that HashMap<Ref<UniquedStringImpl>> doesn't
> compile, since there is no empty values for Ref<>. Thank you very much for
> the review Yusuki! If you doesn't agree with that approach, feel free to set
> cq-.</span >
I think we should open a bug to fix this in the future. We should be able to put Ref<T> in a HashMap, and we should probably make IdentifierSet be HashSet<Ref<UniquedStringImpl>></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>