<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [Gstreamer] [MSE] [GTK] test imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/media-source/mediasource-seek-beyond-duration.html crashes"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167109#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [Gstreamer] [MSE] [GTK] test imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/media-source/mediasource-seek-beyond-duration.html crashes"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167109">bug 167109</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:clopez@igalia.com" title="Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clopez@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=167109#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> The reason why all these imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/media-source tests
> should be skipped is explained in
> <a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=297003&action=diff">https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=297003&action=diff</a> (line 234):
> "Webm is required by the tests but we don't support it."
>
> Please, skip these tests again until webm support is enabled.</span >
Of those 54 tests there are 18 passing (even without webm support). How is that?
Also I don't think skipping tests is the best idea. If you skip tests you pretty much don't have any coverage regarding them. You will miss any revision causing them to suddenly crash or timeout. By marking them as failing or crashing you get basic test coverage for them even when they are still not working or the feature is still not 100% implemented.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>