<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] Install missing media plugins API is totally broken, test /webkit2/WebKitWebView/install-missing-plugins-permission-request times out in the bots"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147822#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] Install missing media plugins API is totally broken, test /webkit2/WebKitWebView/install-missing-plugins-permission-request times out in the bots"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147822">bug 147822</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:pnormand@igalia.com" title="Philippe Normand <pnormand@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Philippe Normand</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=147822#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=147822#c15">comment #15</a>)
> > We should (partly at least) revert the changes made to the player. If
> > video/mp4 isn't in the supported mime-types list there is no chance the
> > codec installer fires up when a h264 video is being loaded.
>
> Do you know how to do it without breaking YouTube? YouTube is more important
> than this API.
>
> Ideally the behavior would be something along the lines of:
>
> * Try H.264, see it's not supported by the client
> * Fallback to WebM if supported by the server
> * Run codec installer only server does not have WebM available</span >
I don't see how that would work. What's wrong with the proposal in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=147822#c10">comment 10</a> ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>