<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] JSC test wasm.yaml/wasm/js-api/test_basic_api.js.default-wasm and wasm.yaml/wasm/js-api/test_Module.js.default-wasm fail with Exception: ReferenceError: Can't find variable: WebAssembly"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163846#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] JSC test wasm.yaml/wasm/js-api/test_basic_api.js.default-wasm and wasm.yaml/wasm/js-api/test_Module.js.default-wasm fail with Exception: ReferenceError: Can't find variable: WebAssembly"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163846">bug 163846</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jfbastien@apple.com" title="JF Bastien <jfbastien@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">JF Bastien</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> > Are the conditions at the top wrong for GTK?
>
> They look sane to me.</span >
Hmm, I don't think they are:
$isFTLPlatform = !($architecture == "x86" || $architecture == "arm" || $hostOS == "windows" || $hostOS == "linux" && $architecture == "arm64")
We'd need a way to see if the platform built with ENABLE(WEBASSEMBLY). I'm not sure how this is done.
<span class="quote">> Me either! I think we need to figure out how it is that WebAssembly works at
> all on the Mac port, then decide if it's ready to be turned on for other
> ports or not. If it's not ready yet, then we should find a way to skip the
> test conditional on whether or not it's enabled. </span >
It's not ready yet, and we're only concentrating on Mac bits right now so some of the code will need Linux-isms to work well on Linux. I wouldn't enable it yet, unless someone is willing to do the Linux work.
<span class="quote">> Alternatively, we could modify the test to pass whenever the WebAssembly
> variable is not defined, and assume that we would notice if such a major
> feature accidentally disappeared.</span >
I'd rather not since the entire point is to test that WebAssembly works. It's unlikely that we'd mess that up, but still it's not released so nobody would notice.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>