<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [JSC] Implement parsing of Async Functions"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161409#c15">Comment # 15</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [JSC] Implement parsing of Async Functions"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161409">bug 161409</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com" title="Yusuke Suzuki &lt;utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Yusuke Suzuki</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>I took the benchmark on my OS X laptop last night.

shell&gt; Tools/Scripts/run-jsc-benchmarks baseline:WebKitBuild/async-master/Release/jsc patched:WebKitBuild/async/Release/jsc --outer=30 --octane --benchmark='closure|jquery'

Generating benchmark report at /Users/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patched_Octane_dandelion_20160909_1144_report.txt
And raw data at /Users/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patched_Octane_dandelion_20160909_1144.json

Benchmark report for Octane on dandelion (MacBookPro10,1).

VMs tested:
&quot;baseline&quot; at /Users/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/async-master/Release/jsc
&quot;patched&quot; at /Users/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/async/Release/jsc

Collected 30 samples per benchmark/VM, with 30 VM invocations per benchmark. Emitted a call to
gc() between sample measurements. Used 1 benchmark iteration per VM invocation for warm-up. Used
the jsc-specific preciseTime() function to get microsecond-level timing. Reporting benchmark
execution times with 95% confidence intervals in milliseconds.

                         baseline                  patched                                      

closure              0.59315+-0.00124          0.59265+-0.00138       
jquery               7.91025+-0.02773    ?     7.91560+-0.03665       ?

&lt;geometric&gt;          2.16606+-0.00448          2.16585+-0.00537         might be 1.0001x faster

It seems that the performance is neutral.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>