<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [JSC] Implement parsing of Async Functions"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161409#c18">Comment # 18</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [JSC] Implement parsing of Async Functions"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161409">bug 161409</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com" title="Yusuke Suzuki &lt;utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Yusuke Suzuki</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=161409#c17">comment #17</a>)
<span class="quote">&gt; er, the cause of the poor linux perf.</span >

OK, I've retaken the performance on my Linux box with rebooting.

Generating benchmark report at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patch_Octane_hanayamata_20160910_0605_report.txt
And raw data at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patch_Octane_hanayamata_20160910_0605.json

Benchmark report for Octane on hanayamata.

VMs tested:
&quot;baseline&quot; at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/async-master/Release/bin/jsc
&quot;patch&quot; at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/async/Release/bin/jsc

Collected 10 samples per benchmark/VM, with 10 VM invocations per benchmark. Emitted a call to
gc() between sample measurements. Used 1 benchmark iteration per VM invocation for warm-up. Used
the jsc-specific preciseTime() function to get microsecond-level timing. Reporting benchmark
execution times with 95% confidence intervals in milliseconds.

                         baseline                   patch                                       

closure              0.62470+-0.01647          0.62386+-0.00330       
jquery               8.14041+-0.09801    ?     8.17138+-0.04920       ?

&lt;geometric&gt;          2.25454+-0.02681    ?     2.25780+-0.00850       ? might be 1.0014x slower

Seems good.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>