<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Don't leak the names of [private] functions in JS built-ins"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158778#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Don't leak the names of [private] functions in JS built-ins"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158778">bug 158778</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com" title="Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>"> <span class="fn">Adam Bergkvist</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=158778#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Let's keep it open for now.
> There may be cases where this issue might arise again.</span >
OK with me.
<span class="quote">> Also, usually, the caller of the private method should ensure that
> parameters passed to the function are all fine. In such a case, the checks
> should become assertions.</span >
I haven't looked into the effect of the UNLIKELY macro, but it sounds like something we might want to use it if we still want to keep the "second step argument" checks in native code.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>