<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - LLInt should support other types of prototype GetById caching."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158083#c26">Comment # 26</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - LLInt should support other types of prototype GetById caching."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158083">bug 158083</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:keith_miller@apple.com" title="Keith Miller <keith_miller@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Keith Miller</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=158083#c25">comment #25</a>)
<span class="quote">> In this patch I fixed the regressions and tried to inline the op_code. I am
> sending my experimental code commented. However, I am facing problems to get
> the Getter Function and store it in the Calle member of the JS Stack entry.
> Could you help me on this?</span >
Thinking about this further I realized that in order to inline the call we would need to have CallLinkInfo for the getter Callee. That would tell us what address to call when the function we are calling gets tiered up. Unfortunately, as far as I know, we don't have any kind of CallLinkInfo for the LLInt. Without, CallLinkInfo I think you would need to call into C++ to find the call location anyway. Let me look into this further but I think it might not be worthwhile to inline normal getters. We should still be able to inline custom getters however.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>