<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [JSC] implement async functions proposal"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156147#c113">Comment # 113</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [JSC] implement async functions proposal"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156147">bug 156147</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com" title="Yusuke Suzuki &lt;utatane.tea&#64;gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Yusuke Suzuki</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>The performance of the Parser.h / Parser.cpp reverted version is the following.
It gives us super nice insight that the cause of the code-load regression should reside in Parser.cpp's change.

Generating benchmark report at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patched_Octane_hanayamata_20160529_0328_report.txt
And raw data at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/baseline_patched_Octane_hanayamata_20160529_0328.json

Benchmark report for Octane on hanayamata.

VMs tested:
&quot;baseline&quot; at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/old/Release/bin/jsc
&quot;patched&quot; at /home/yusukesuzuki/dev/WebKit/WebKitBuild/async/Release/bin/jsc

Collected 10 samples per benchmark/VM, with 10 VM invocations per benchmark. Emitted a call to
gc() between sample measurements. Used 1 benchmark iteration per VM invocation for warm-up. Used
the jsc-specific preciseTime() function to get microsecond-level timing. Reporting benchmark
execution times with 95% confidence intervals in milliseconds.

                         baseline                  patched                                      

closure              0.62566+-0.00522          0.62292+-0.00696       
jquery               8.03686+-0.02728          7.96035+-0.06515       

&lt;geometric&gt;          2.24234+-0.00828          2.22676+-0.01878         might be 1.0070x faster</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>