<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Implement the Wasm object in WebAssembly"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157313#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Implement the Wasm object in WebAssembly"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157313">bug 157313</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:xan.lopez@gmail.com" title="Xan Lopez <xan.lopez@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Xan Lopez</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=279769&action=diff" name="attach_279769" title="First WIP patch for WASM Module Parser">attachment 279769</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=279769&action=edit" title="First WIP patch for WASM Module Parser">[details]</a></span>
First WIP patch for WASM Module Parser
First WIP patch of the module parser.
The spec has changed quite a bit since the last updates to our code. Relevant comments:
- I have modified the wasm-module.js test file from Gecko, since I could not find a polyfill-like prototype that could output the latest version of the wasm binary format (?).
- Most of the changes are easily done continuining the previous structure of the code. Most relevant thing is that I'm doing some backtracking in case I fail to read the section that should come next. This could be done without backtracking at all, but it seemed simple enough to do it like this for a first test.
Uploading just the first reworked section parsing for comments, but all the others could be done in a similar way.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>