<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Modern IDB: http://w3c-test.org/IndexedDB/interfaces.worker has lots of failures, even with IDB-in-workers enabled"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157600#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Modern IDB: http://w3c-test.org/IndexedDB/interfaces.worker has lots of failures, even with IDB-in-workers enabled"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157600">bug 157600</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cdumez@apple.com" title="Chris Dumez <cdumez@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Chris Dumez</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=157600#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> As a layperson in this area, it seemed to be that the difference was related
> to how we expose these interfaces (which I assumed meant constructors) on
> DOMWindow vs WorkerGlobalScope.
>
> Not sure if that will give you any tips towards the difference.</span >
I don't think the issue is really with the IDB implementation. If you look at the corresponding test for workers:
<a href="http://w3c-test.org/workers/interfaces.worker">http://w3c-test.org/workers/interfaces.worker</a>
We are failing most of it as well. I think the issue is with our worker support somehow.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>