<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - AX: SVG images are not exposed in the AX api"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156774#c19">Comment # 19</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - AX: SVG images are not exposed in the AX api"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156774">bug 156774</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:n_wang@apple.com" title="Nan Wang <n_wang@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Nan Wang</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=156774#c18">comment #18</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=156774#c17">comment #17</a>)
> > I think in this case we're talking about someone adding an
> > aria-label/aria-labelledby to a svg root and there's no other accessible
> > children. in that case it seems like we should expose that element right?
> > the author probably wanted to expose something to the user
>
> If the svg root has an aria-label/aria-labelledby [*], we already expose
> that svg root.
>
> I believe the question at hand is if that exposed svg root has a child shape
> (e.g. a circle element), should we include that child shape?
>
> From the newly-proposed test and patch and comments, I believe Nan is saying
> "yes". Fred and I are saying "only if that child shape itself has attributes
> like [*] aria-label/aria-labelledby." The latter is what we're already doing.
>
> [*] Or a title element child, or a desc element child, or is focusable, etc.</span >
Thanks for the clarification. I think the problem is that we are ignoring the empty group even if it's exposed. Maybe we should fix it in the screenreader side.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>