<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - In Voice over, activating a fragment URL should transfer focus and caret to the destination"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116046#c26">Comment # 26</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - In Voice over, activating a fragment URL should transfer focus and caret to the destination"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116046">bug 116046</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jcraig@apple.com" title="James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">James Craig</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=116046#c25">comment #25</a>)
<span class="quote">> To put it differently, there are two orthogonal but related questions:
> 1. What does the spec says about when the node designated as the sequential
> navigation starting point is removed from the document.
> 2. What is the desirable behavior when in the aforementioned situation
> regardless of the spec'ed behavior.</span >
Seems like the desirable behavior is to move the sequential navigation point after the previous sibling of the removed node.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>