<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - JSC Sampling Profiler: First Bound Function name inadvertently appears where all bound functions get call"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153636#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - JSC Sampling Profiler: First Bound Function name inadvertently appears where all bound functions get call"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153636">bug 153636</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sbarati@apple.com" title="Saam Barati <sbarati@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Saam Barati</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=153636#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Also reasonable, and probably the most accurate:
>
> (3) The "bound" function appears in the trace, with its name demarcated:
>
> => [f] doStuff
> => [N] bound methodOne
> => [f] methodOne
> => [N] bound methodTwo
> => [f] methodTwo
>
> One of the things in the ES6 compat table is that (foo.bind()).name is
> "bound foo", so this would make sense. But we would probably offer some
> frontend convenience to merge bound function call frames with the call to
> the target function, and still end up with (1) eventually.</span >
This is what it will look like</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>