<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - prepare-ChangeLog should include radar number"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152839#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - prepare-ChangeLog should include radar number"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152839">bug 152839</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:joepeck@webkit.org" title="Joseph Pecoraro <joepeck@webkit.org>"> <span class="fn">Joseph Pecoraro</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=152839#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> If prepare-changelog and its downstream webkitperl used the bugzilla JSON
> API, this would be pretty easy to do by looking for <rdar in a comment. I
> don't think it will be easy right now, since it's not listed in a
> well-defined field for scraping. I don't know if any other functionality
> needs to scrape comments HTML in bugzilla.</span >
Currently `prepare-ChangeLog -b ###` will fetch the XML data for a bug:
$ curl --insecure --silent '<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - prepare-ChangeLog should include radar number"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=152839">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152839</a>&ctype=xml&excludefield=attachmentdata'
Which includes comments. Importer comments would be easy to recognize:
<span class="quote">> <long_desc isprivate="0">
> <commentid>1153467</commentid>
> <who name="Radar WebKit Bug Importer">webkit-bug-importer</who>
> <bug_when>2016-01-07 11:06:14 -0800</bug_when>
> <thetext>&lt;rdar://problem/24093563&gt;</thetext>
> </long_desc></span >
I suppose I could hack in just searching for that single radar link comment. That will at least handle the importer pattern (which is all I really about).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>