<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [WinCairo] Improve test results for fast layouttests."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150464#c12">Comment # 12</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [WinCairo] Improve test results for fast layouttests."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150464">bug 150464</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:peavo@outlook.com" title="peavo@outlook.com">peavo@outlook.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=150464#c11">comment #11</a>)
<span class="quote">> Doesn't applying the mac ascent adjustment on WinCairo make WinCairo layout
> text more similar to the AppleWin port? Ideally the two ports would lay
> everything out the same.</span >
I believe it makes it more different :) As I have understood it, the Mac adjustment hack is applied to make the Mac font metrics more similar to certain Windows font metrics (Times, for example), because some Windows font metrics had become a de facto standard on the web. When getting font metrics on Windows with the native API, we already have the "correct" metrics, and there is no need to apply the Mac ascent adjustment, except for AppleWin, which is using CoreGraphics, and thereby behaving in the same way as Mac. Debugging also shows that if we apply the ascent adjustment, the layout elements are too big compared to what is expected.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>